between no
I have had the
opportunity of obtaining to some extent Mr. Sharp's views, which d may enlarge upon subsequently,
while merely stating in brief his leading reasons objecting to the course)
ao
you
for
ask)
his Attorney to accept.
Mr Sharp does not want to
sell the property
in question at all,
rightly believing that it is
becoming
Q.o
the city extends
it, he is
if
may
on
dank
suby
more valuable
all sides around
aware that under the leases.
j
be reamned for public purposes, and if such public purpose existed would not refuse to part with it on adequate compensation; but he maintains that such purpose) must be some improvement of the city by
the Colonial Government, whereas I understand that the object of the reenuption is simply the enlargement
>
of-
70
of the property of the Military Authorition, adjoining, who have no. right of resumption
the
but on
contrary every facility and means of pundhaving in the ordinary way; under they have for
some years past been treating for the purchase, and that they should no
now take advantage of a misconstruction of the resumption. alances to obtain possession of his
-property at a cheaper price than the market value,
both unfair and illegal. I am prepared
to ursharp
A v
Mr Sharpe
Attorney to treat for the sale of the
land
of
question and the price that by comparison with sales property near his, Mr Sharp considers
one is $3 per foot,
the total
021
a fair area of $ 86,798 square feet $260,394 –– I trust that some arrangement-
for a friendly sale of the property will
be adopted instead of the
he
Corree)
ee of
resumption which Mr Sharp
Considere
9
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.